With a broken-down oven, in a hotel kitchen, on an uninhabited island
Subscribe and Save up to 45%
June 1 While reading an old news article, I came upon a surprising admission by George W. Bush: he confessed that he is a novelist. In an interview with CBS he said, discussing the struggles of his contested election, “It’s been a fascination, as I’m sure you can imagine. I’m not a very good novelist. But it’d make a pretty interesting novel.”
Now, suppose I say, “I am a very bad ice skater.” This means that at some time I have skated on ice. Otherwise I would have remarked, “I suspect I am not a good ice skater.” So if Bush says he is a poor novelist, he must have written novels.
This could explain why so little of Bush’s time is accounted for. As a novelist myself, I know how much of my day appears wasted. I spend hours sitting in the kitchen reading four-month-old newspapers. Someone calls me on the phone, and I chat for forty-five minutes. But all this is preparation for the writing of my next chapter.
I know what you’re thinking: “Bush is too unintelligent to write novels.” First of all, remember what Bush himself said: “I’m not a very good novelist.” It’s possible that, though he has written many novels, none of them are successes. Besides, you and I know him only as president. Suppose we knew James Joyce only as president. He might appear to us aloof, testy, and muttering. We might be certain that he, too, is an awful writer.
We must await, with ample patience, the eventual publication of Bush’s books before we can truly judge his literary gifts. Until then, we can be proud to have our first novelist president.
Americans will grow stupider and stupider until they can no longer read rfe words bh thes poem. And gyht the bgjhi increasingly njkiuy eruhj npoli when fdgjkol nmlpwq.
June 6 Recently we had a mouse, here in the house.
At first, we did not see this mouse. (I don’t know whether to call the mouse “him” or “her.”) We saw only its turds in the morning, on the sponge in the kitchen sink. And we saw the small gouges it made in our food. It ate pears, bread, and soap.
After a few weeks, I sometimes noticed a blur late at night while I did the dishes — a gray streak, almost like a line.
More time passed, and the mouse slowed down. It had a strange way of walking: it leaned forward, with its tail up in the air, like a scholar who walks while reading a book.
Soon the mouse was all around us. At night, I would lie on the futon in the living room, and the mouse would walk up and down the cracks of the floor, searching for grains of rice and millet my daughter had dropped during the day.
I began to worry that mice are unclean. What does my guru say about mice? I tried to remember. He says all animals are either “friends of man” or “enemies of man.” Are mice friends or enemies?
One night while I was meditating, I heard a scrambling sound beside me. Then I felt the mouse sitting on my head, like a person standing atop Mount Rushmore. The mouse began to dig in my scalp, looking for food.
I began to think mice are enemies of man.
We tried to catch the mouse. Sylvia placed a plastic container on top of it, but she worried she was pinching its tail. When she lifted the container, the mouse escaped.
Two days later Violet caught the mouse. She took it to Phoenicia Park and set it free.
Afterward the house felt lonely, and smaller.
September 2 Visitors to the American Midwest have noted a haunting consistency of tone. A tepid affability inflects the speech. Polyester is often worn. White is the primary color (of skin, and of many buildings). No one is a transvestite.
A simple look at the map explains why this is. One speaks of a dull man as being “square.” The states in the middle of America are almost literally square. (Iowa comes closest to perfect squareness.) Some extremely linear autocrat — almost certainly a man — divided up our lush continent into near rectangles, like a butcher chopping meat. How can the populace feel free while it inhabits parallelograms?
By comparison, consider the state I presently inhabit, New York, which resembles a crushed hat with a feather (Long Island). The boundaries of this state include Lake Ontario, the Saint Lawrence River, Lake Erie, the Delaware River, the Long Island Sound, the Atlantic Ocean, and Lake Champlain. In New York, eccentricity has long bloomed.
The solution is to redraw the Midwest by natural boundaries. Eventually, the states would look more like rumpled clothes and less like cardboard boxes.
Then perhaps Midwesterners would begin to wiggle and joke, and wear long Polynesian gowns.
If you are dissatisfied with this poem IN ANY WAY, return it to: Sparrow, P.O. Box 63, Phoenicia, NY 12464. He will mail you a refund within six to eight days. Only this poem contains this unique offer.
September 12 I just realized that “The Lone Ranger and Tonto” is an oxymoron. The Lone Ranger is, by definition, lone. That is, he is unaccompanied, solo, bereft of retinue.
Am I the first person in the United States to recognize the grave implications of this? Because if the Lone Ranger is considered lone, yet rides constantly with Tonto, then Tonto is not identified as a man but is relegated to the same category as Silver, the Lone Ranger’s horse.
Why is it not paradoxical that this “lone” figure appears with another person? Because the person is of non-European descent.
How awful we American television-watchers are!
In the future, I suggest we refer to this masked character as the Accompanied Ranger.
September 27 In the documentary Derrida, an unseen interlocutor asks French philosopher Jacques Derrida: “Which philosopher would you want for your mother?”
Derrida begins to think. His eyelids flutter. “That’s a good question,” he says, smiling. Then he continues to think.
It is the longest scene of a person thinking that I have ever watched.
Inside his mind, I imagine, Derrida is like a woman trying on hats. As each philosopher appears to him — Socrates, Kant, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein — Derrida asks, Could you be my mother?
“None of them could be my mother,” Derrida finally concludes. “All of them are fathers.” He says this quite sadly.
Nine days after seeing this film, I still recall the scene of Derrida thinking. Why aren’t there more movies of women and men engaged in thought? I am tired of watching actors have sex. I am anxious to see more thinking films.
These excerpts were originally published in Sparrow’s column “Quarter to Three,” which appears in the Hudson Valley journal Chronogram (www.chronogram.com).
Sparrow
I find it curious that Linda Gallagher, who wrote to complain about The Sun’s anti-Bush tenor [Correspondence, March 2004], would actually read The Sun. Few magazines give such an open forum for liberal thought these days.
To say that President Bush is working for peace, as Gallagher does, is laughable. “Character and integrity”? Is lying about the reasons for war and murdering innocent Iraqi civilians an indication of good character? I think not.
I have insulted so many people in two pages (without intending to insult anyone) that I am uncertain where to begin apologizing. Forgive me, Lone Ranger, Tonto, George W. Bush, people in the Midwest (especially the transvestites!), and all others I offended.
Other people manage to write two pages without insulting nine readers. (I am including personal letters I received.) Why not me? What is my shortcoming? Is it because I spent sixteen years listening to shock-jock Howard Stern every day?
No. I refuse to paint myself as a Howard Stern victim. I will accept responsibility for my moral deficiencies. And I will begin correcting those deficiencies — this afternoon!
Victoria Grostick implies that being a Bush supporter and a Sun reader are mutually exclusive traits. My politics are quite conservative, and I also love The Sun. Most of the time I feel kinship with its entire readership, but I am truly getting tired of this anti-Bush sentiment.
President Bush did not intend to deceive the American people. He simply told us what he was told by his advisors, some of whom lied to him. Nevertheless, we know Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction because he used them on his own people. The fact that the weapons cannot be found simply means they have been moved outside the country, possibly to Syria or Iran. The way the UN dragged its feet over the inspection process, it’s little wonder the weapons are nowhere to be found. The Iraqis had twelve years to move them.
I am tired of liberals branding Bush a “murderer.” Do they think that the Revolutionary War was fought entirely without civilian casualties? What about the Civil War, or World War I, or World War II? War is ugly, and it causes deaths, both of soldiers and of noncombatants. But this country might not exist today had we not participated in those wars. Some things are worth dying for. I happen to believe that freedom is one of them.
I suspect that Sparrow’s tongue is planted firmly in cheek in “Money-Back Guarantee” [November 2003], but the piece is still offensive. I’m surprised that someone who worries about the humanity of the fictional character Tonto would so casually dismiss the Midwest as a polyester-wearing, eccentric-free bastion of conformity.
Sparrow puts forth the humorous theory that the Midwest is boring because the states are square in shape, whereas the state he inhabits, New York, owes its eccentricity to the strangeness of its boundary. He then uses this premise to wallow in stereotypes and slurs. He may be joking, but his words still sting. He writes, “White is the primary color (of skin, and of many buildings). No one is a transvestite.” True, there is a white majority, but isn’t this the case in nearly every part of the country? I’ve lived in the lily-white Midwest for twenty-three years, and I have Iraqi, Malaysian, Mexican, Vietnamese, Russian, Turkish, Jewish, African-American, and homosexual friends. I have to admit, I don’t know any transvestites, but my mother worked with one in her small Midwestern town.
As for Sparrow’s implication that the Midwest is lacking in eccentricity, tell that to native sons Marlon Brando, Bob Dylan, Devo, Harvey Pekar, and Prince. Tell that to the hundreds of lovable oddballs I met while living in the Midwest. And none of them had to change their name to “Sparrow” to prove to the world that they were interesting.
As a long-time subscriber to The Sun, I am more than a little annoyed at the increasing slams at our president in your pages. I guess you do not care that some of your readers happen to believe in what our president is trying to accomplish: peace and economic expansion for America and the rest of the world. We support his tactics and respect our president’s character and integrity.
In his essay “Money-Back Guarantee,” Sparrow claims that “Bush is too unintelligent to write novels.” George W. Bush is more eloquent in his direct honesty, including his endearing misspoken words, than anything Sparrow has written for The Sun. While our president is standing at the forefront of history, setting a clear course for our world’s future, Sparrow is busy choosing which insult to sling to prove his intellectual superiority.
Victoria Grostick finds it “curious” that I, a conservative, actually read The Sun [Correspondence, May 2004]. Does she think that only liberals can enjoy insightful writing? She seems pretty sure that the president is a liar. I am pretty sure there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Sparrow wonders how the Lone Ranger can be called “lone” if Tonto rides with him. Someone should tell Sparrow that the Lone Ranger is called that because he alone survived the massacre of his troop of rangers. Tonto found him, cared for him, and saved his life.
Any fifty-year-old could tell you that.